Hugo Chavez: One of my favourite living politicians. El Presidente of Venezuala. Fighting with his internal demons, namely the banana republic oligarchy who were sadly not decapitated in a communist revolution. Sadly not because I wish death on them but because the interaction between the democratically elected charismatic leader and them confuses the issue as to his intentions. Because of their actions through coups and blatant ridiculous propaganda force him to cling to power and act more leftist than I think he truly is. Were it not for the polarizing influences of the old families, Venezuela would be more susceptible to more subtle machinations but with them in place it means Chavez has to keep up his wildly undiplomatic but highly entertaining antics. (His Spanish and US confrontations)
He is a new left that has emerged in South America, a so called Bolivarian, which sums up to nationalist/continental-ist left. A People proud of being a people and of course bucking the globalization policy originating from the U.S. Chavez is unwittingly playing up the goal of globalization, by uniting South America he will make it that much easier for what I think is the unification of the planet. However the argument as always is the semantics of how to get there. Bolivarianism is not Banana Republic vassalism that the oligarchs want and it is not becoming a client US state as in Columbia and El Salvador.
Without a doubt Chavez is remaking himself into a reincarnation of his mentor Fidel Castro, but without an overt betrayal/confrontation with the US the relations will sum up to just a charismatic blowhard in a chamber of sleepy old crooks. The US needs Venezuela and Venezuela needs the US and the world needs peace. So far he has resisted the temptation of “going dictator” but as mentioned, the oligarchs make him resisting temptation that much harder.
The US interest in Venezuela is complex. There is Oil and resources, religious and political lobbies that are losing steam because they don’t have any more Oil money and there is communism. Chavez courts communism openly and allies himself with former soviet clients as well as Russia. For the most part if it looks like a fish, swims like a fish and stinks like a fish then its probably a fish. But communism was a ludicorous and abysmally failed experiment which quickly turned into an industry centred around murder espionage propaganda and military. Surely he cant want that?!
So with all that background, France’s new president Sarkozy is doing some big swing politics. He wants South American anti-gov rebels to release a potentially valuable future ally which will give France a much needed foothold in the West. And he wants Chavez to do it. Chavez has at most militarily aided and at least sympathized with FARC. He can get the job done. Chavez is as well a neighbour and a regional influence (Bolivia, Brazil, the Caribbean, Ecuador, Argentina). He also builds relationships with almost everyone including the UK, Israel and Iran. Colombia on the other hand is a major supplier of US cocaine (and coffee!) and major customer of US weapons.
The tensions are obvious. Bolivarianism decrees that Chavez strengthen ties with anybody that leaders who will promote a united (socialist) South America and undermines anyone that adheres to US hegemony. The FARC is one example of USSA, and apparently Colombia’s military commander is another. Unfortunately the Franco-American ties are on a rebound and Chavez is…so Colombia’s President, Álvaro Vélez will find himself short on support.
Funnily enough, Vélez is Harvard and Oxford among other things, making his Political skills and leaning surprisingly pro-left. Simon Bolivar is the first President of Columbia. Aside from the FARC assassination of his dad, and Columbia’s relationship with the US, and of course political jealousy/vanity the two should get along.
References? I don’t need em, I don’t invent stuff I just read a lot and write. What have I read? Newspapers from around the world and wikipedia?

