The other day I was teasing one of my Pakistani friends about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. What did he think Pakistan would do if 3 US warships pulled into Karachi harbour and Aabrams tanks started rolling towards Islamabad? Would they shoot at themselves? Wipe themselves off the map to save themselves?
He was a bit set back; the US is, after all, behind all things in the conspiratorially minded, but despite the ever present notional threat what would his country men do if thier suspicions were ever confirmed?
He then replied that Pakistan would spite the invading US forces by firing thier longest range missiles at Telaviv or Jerusalem. His solution was to bomb the Jews and kill the millions of Jewish and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. This is of course allowing a quick recalibrating of the missiles pointed at new Deli and Mumbai and a trouble free GPS guided flight to it’s maximum projected range over the four intervening states, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and Jordan.
The commander in this scenario has now added attemped holocaust to his crimes and done nothing about the forces bearing down on his position. I say attempted because Israel in it’s own paranoia of Persian attack is probably well defended from missile attacks and seeing a missile from the east will almost certainly obliterate Tehran in response. So the commander has also essentially triggered the murder of millions of Iranians and scattered nuclear debris over Jordan and Iraq. The Muslim world east of Pakistan would come to a quick pause. And half the possible reinforcements against the American invader would be now dead or visible in the dark.
My solution would be less messy. My commander would fire at India, guarenteeing a sure retaliation which would obliterate American forces as well as the denizens they would be “liberating”. My friend and I are obviously not strategists because were this our actual policy, we would be first strike-d by American ICBMs or space based weapons long before we got any birds in the air.
I guess the moral of this story is the only reason for any country to have even one nuclear weapon is to turn it’s own region into a wasteland. “Attack us and we’ll make our place more worthless than it already is”. It’s like the story of the guy that goes to prison and eats and bathes in his own shit to deter potential rapists. I don’t think it ever occurs to him that consuming and wearing fecal matter may be more degrading than enjoying the strong rythmic pounding of a man who obviously values his fealty more than the system that put him there.
Maintaining a nuclear deterent is costly, cumbersome and worthless in the long run. Despite having the ability to vaporize the topsoil off the whole planet and darken the world for centuries, America and the UK with it’s me-too (second hand) Trident have not deterred hostile attacks state sponsored or otherwise. Developing nations which follow this dead end path prove only that they are mired in 19th century imperialist thinking and 20th century hand me downs. The only beneficiaries of nuclear proliferation are the people who have no country and no army to lose and everything to gain by the use of weapons of terror.
